| AMBER Archive (2008)Subject: Re: AMBER: Sander instead of PMEMD
From: Cristina Sisu (csds2_at_cam.ac.uk)Date: Fri May 30 2008 - 10:22:10 CDT
 
 
 
 
Thanks for the hint! I'll try it right away.
 Cheers,
Cristina
 
 Florian Haberl wrote:
> Hi,
 >
 > On Friday, 30. May 2008 16:32, Cristina Sisu wrote:
 >
 >> Thanks Bob,
 >>
 >> Then I think I will give it a try with sander. Fingers crossed!
 >> But are you sure that pmemd does not support mm_pbsa? Because according
 >> to the mmpbsa tutorial, it should work
 >> http://amber.scripps.edu/tutorials/advanced/tutorial3/section2.htm.
 >>
 >>
 >
 > the mm pbsa analysis is a post analysis, so you have to seperate the snapshots
 > and than recalculate it with sander. If the simulation is done with sander or
 > pmemd doesn`t matter, the only difference is than pmemd is faster ;)
 >
 > A small hint before starting mm pbsa analysis: It is faster to transfer the
 > trajectory to your wanted snapshot frequency (normally every 25 or 50ps),
 > before starting mm pbsa analysis.
 >
 > greetings,
 >
 > Florian
 >
 >
 >
 >> Cristina
 >>
 >> Robert Duke wrote:
 >>
 >>> The primary advantage pmemd offers is purely speed; there are a few
 >>> minor convenience tweaks here and there, but it is mostly supposed to
 >>> do a subset of sander functionality, not the other way around.  So
 >>> there should never be a problem moving back to sander from pmemd, as a
 >>> general rule.  Also note that pmemd does not support energy
 >>> decomposition through the idecomp switch, and therefore does not
 >>> support mm_pbsa anyway.
 >>> Regards - Bob Duke
 >>>
 >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cristina Sisu" <csds2_at_cam.ac.uk>
 >>> To: <amber_at_scripps.edu>
 >>> Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 9:47 AM
 >>> Subject: AMBER: Sander instead of PMEMD
 >>>
 >>>
 >>>> Dear Ambers,
 >>>>
 >>>> I have a problem running PMEMD on our cluster. As far as I understand it
 >>>> does not seem to be a program problem but rather the way that our
 >>>> cluster is build (on module, environments, etc.). I want to do some
 >>>> MMPBSA calculations on a protein-peptide ligand complex. Can I use for
 >>>> the production run, Sander instead of the PMEMD? With the periodic
 >>>> boundary condition parameter switched on, and using the same input (.in)
 >>>> file as for PMEMD?
 >>>> Would the trajectory obtained in this way be suitable for extracting
 >>>> snapshots necessary for mmpbsa ?
 >>>>
 >>>> Thanks,
 >>>> Cristina
 >>>>
 
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
 To post, send mail to amber_at_scripps.edu
 To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" (in the *body* of the email)
 to majordomo_at_scripps.edu
 
 
 
 |