| AMBER Archive (2008)Subject: Re: AMBER: Sander instead of PMEMD
From: Florian Haberl (Florian.Haberl_at_chemie.uni-erlangen.de)Date: Fri May 30 2008 - 10:06:42 CDT
 
 
 
 
Hi,
 On Friday, 30. May 2008 16:32, Cristina Sisu wrote:
> Thanks Bob,
 >
 > Then I think I will give it a try with sander. Fingers crossed!
 > But are you sure that pmemd does not support mm_pbsa? Because according
 > to the mmpbsa tutorial, it should work
 > http://amber.scripps.edu/tutorials/advanced/tutorial3/section2.htm.
 >
 
 the mm pbsa analysis is a post analysis, so you have to seperate the snapshots 
and than recalculate it with sander. If the simulation is done with sander or
 pmemd doesn`t matter, the only difference is than pmemd is faster ;)
 
 A small hint before starting mm pbsa analysis: It is faster to transfer the 
trajectory to your wanted snapshot frequency (normally every 25 or 50ps),
 before starting mm pbsa analysis.
 
 greetings,
 Florian
 > Cristina
>
 > Robert Duke wrote:
 > > The primary advantage pmemd offers is purely speed; there are a few
 > > minor convenience tweaks here and there, but it is mostly supposed to
 > > do a subset of sander functionality, not the other way around.  So
 > > there should never be a problem moving back to sander from pmemd, as a
 > > general rule.  Also note that pmemd does not support energy
 > > decomposition through the idecomp switch, and therefore does not
 > > support mm_pbsa anyway.
 > > Regards - Bob Duke
 > >
 > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cristina Sisu" <csds2_at_cam.ac.uk>
 > > To: <amber_at_scripps.edu>
 > > Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 9:47 AM
 > > Subject: AMBER: Sander instead of PMEMD
 > >
 > >> Dear Ambers,
 > >>
 > >> I have a problem running PMEMD on our cluster. As far as I understand it
 > >> does not seem to be a program problem but rather the way that our
 > >> cluster is build (on module, environments, etc.). I want to do some
 > >> MMPBSA calculations on a protein-peptide ligand complex. Can I use for
 > >> the production run, Sander instead of the PMEMD? With the periodic
 > >> boundary condition parameter switched on, and using the same input (.in)
 > >> file as for PMEMD?
 > >> Would the trajectory obtained in this way be suitable for extracting
 > >> snapshots necessary for mmpbsa ?
 > >>
 > >> Thanks,
 > >> Cristina
 >
 > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
 > The AMBER Mail Reflector
 > To post, send mail to amber_at_scripps.edu
 > To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" (in the *body* of the email)
 >       to majordomo_at_scripps.edu
 
 
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Florian Haberl                        
 Computer-Chemie-Centrum   
 Universitaet Erlangen/ Nuernberg
 Naegelsbachstr 25
 D-91052 Erlangen
 Telephone:  	+49(0) − 9131 − 85 26573
 Mailto: florian.haberl AT chemie.uni-erlangen.de
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber_at_scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" (in the *body* of the email)
      to majordomo_at_scripps.edu
 
 |