AMBER Archive (2007)Subject: AMBER: Input files for the Potential of mean force.
From: Catein Catherine (askamber23_at_hotmail.com) 
Date: Sun Jun 10 2007 - 21:43:12 CDT
 
 
 
 
Thank you Carlos.
 
 It is the input  file that  I used.  I firstly fix the position of the 
 
receptor active site by position restraint as folllows:
 
 Production MD
 
&cntrl
 
  imin=0, saltcon=0.5
 
  nstlim=5000, dt=0.002, ntc=1, ntr=1, nmropt=1
 
  ntpr=100, ntwx=100,
 
  cut=16, ntb=0, igb=1,
 
  ntt=3, gamma_ln=1.0,
 
  tempi=300.0, temp0=300.0,
 
/
 
&wt type='DUMPFREQ', istep1=10  /
 
&wt type='END'  /
 
DISANG=1.restraint
 
DUMPAVE=1_md1.result
 
Keep upper residues 1 2 3 4 fixed with weak restraints
 
10.0
 
RES 1 2 3 4
 
END
 
END
 
 Then, In order to monitor the PMF along 1D axis, defined as the distance 
 
between residue 4_at_P (represent the receptor),  and residue 5_at_O18 (represent 
 
the drug).   Then, I change the distance restraint from 1 to 40A.  But at 
 
the same time, I think I should keep the drug at the same orientation 
 
relative to the receptor, I fixed the angle restraint at 0 degree for all 
 
the umbrella sampling runs.  Here is one of the restraint file I used.
 
 # variable distance restrainst
 
&rst iat=4,5 r1=0.0, r2=20.0, r3=20.0, r4=100.0, rk2 = 100.0, rk3 = 100., 
 
iresid=1,
 
ATNAM(1)=P,
 
ATNAM(2)=O18/
 
 # fixed angle restraint
 
&rst iat=4,5,5,5 r1=0.0, r2=0.0, r3=0.0, r4=360.0, rk2 = 1000.0, rk3 = 
 
1000.0, iresid=1,
 
ATNAM(1)=P,
 
ATNAM(2)=N10,
 
ATNAM(3)=N12,
 
ATNAM(4)=O18/
 
 Then, I run the production MD as follows:
 
$AMBERHOME/exe/sander -O -i 1_md1.in -o 1_md1.out -c 1_min.rst -p 1.prmtop 
 
-r 1.md1.rst -x 1_md1.mdcrd -ref 1_min.rst
 
 However, the 1.results that I got is as follows:
 
................
 
     150    20.475  -107.033
 
     160    21.152    25.018
 
     170    21.537  -159.681
 
     180    22.024   -15.385
 
     190    25.157    48.197
 
     200    26.163   -95.016
 
     210    18.122    -8.224
 
     220    16.849  -161.385
 
     230    16.536    50.669
 
     240    18.476   -65.738
 
     250    21.368    19.429
 
     260    20.551   149.414
 
     270    18.940   -76.680
 
     280    21.190   107.498
 
     290    22.064   105.608
 
     300    21.552    18.125
 
     310    20.152   -35.505
 
     320    23.703  -103.914
 
     330    20.593    24.769
 
     340    21.915   -13.790
 
     350    26.825   119.012
 
     360    20.678    25.467
 
     370    24.278    70.666
 
     380    19.640   -92.523
 
.................
 
 I noticed the angle was changing in this umbrella sampling run.  Should I 
 
try to fix the relative orientation  of the drug and receptor for a PMF 
 
calculation?  If yes, what should I do to fix the angle?  Did I do anything 
 
wrong here?  Thanks!
 
 Best regards,
 
 Cat.
 
 >From: "Carlos Simmerling" <carlos.simmerling_at_gmail.com>
 
>Reply-To: amber_at_scripps.edu
 
>To: amber_at_scripps.edu
 
>Subject: Re: AMBER: Potential of mean force.
 
>Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 08:08:06 -0400
 
>
 
>you should probably send your corrected restraint input file if you
 
>want us to check it.
 
>
 
>On 6/8/07, Catein Catherine <askamber23_at_hotmail.com> wrote:
 
>>
 
>>Dear Jerome and other PMF experists,
 
>>
 
>>Thank you very much!  I did the calculations.
 
>>
 
>>I did the PMF calculations accordingly, however, when I tried to do the
 
>>PMF
 
>>along a distance form 1 to 40 A), but keeping the angle unchanged with the
 
>>corrected input files below.  As I want the drug move away from the
 
>>receptor
 
>>along a 1-D axis, I did a series of umbrella sampling MD runs with the
 
>>following restrainst.
 
>>
 
>>Angle             Distance
 
>>-----------------------------------
 
>>180.0                   1.0
 
>>180.0                   2.0
 
>>180.0                   3.0
 
>>180.0                   4.0
 
>>.......
 
>>......
 
>>180.0                  40.0
 
>>
 
>>While the distances were changing from 1.0 to 40.0A as expected, the angle
 
>>also changed from 120.0 to 230.0, even I keep using the same restaint at
 
>>180.0 for all the umbrella sampling MD runs.
 
>>
 
>>Is it just normal?
 
>>
 
>>Can I still use the distance histogram for the PMF calculations but
 
>>ingoring
 
>>the changes in angles?
 
>>
 
>>Should I keep increasing the force constant for the angle restraint untill
 
>>the angle don't vary at all?
 
>>
 
>>Please kindly share your experiences with me.
 
>>
 
>>Thanks
 
>>
 
>>Cat
 
>>
 
>>
 
>> >From: Jerome.GOLEBIOWSKI_at_unice.fr
 
>> >Reply-To: amber_at_scripps.edu
 
>> >To: amber_at_scripps.edu
 
>> >Subject: Re: AMBER: How to fix two angle but do umberlla sampling
 
>> >fordistance?
 
>> >Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 17:38:26 +0200
 
>> >
 
>> >Hi,
 
>> >Your procedure seems OK, you can put various restaint in a simple rst
 
>> >file.
 
>> >However, in your restraint file, "iat" is supposed to correspond to the
 
>> >atom number in your pdb file.
 
>> >If you want to restraint the distance between the first 2 atoms of your
 
>> >structure, you should have :
 
>> >iat=1,2
 
>> >For an angle restraint you should have 3 atoms (ex iat=1,2,3) and 4  for
 
>> >a dihedral (iat=7,8,9,10)
 
>> >
 
>> > > # fixed angle restrainst
 
>> > >
 
>> > > &rst iat=4,5,5 r1=-180.0, r2=180.0, r3=180.0, r4=180.0, rk2 = 1000.0,
 
>> >rk3 =
 
>> >           ^^^^^^^
 
>> >
 
>> >here I don't understand why you write 5,5
 
>> >
 
>> > > &rst iat=4,5,5,5 r1=0.0, r2=0.0, r3=0.0, r4=360.0, rk2 = 1000.0, rk3 
 
>>=
 
>> >            ^^^^^^
 
>> >
 
>> >look at your PDB and write the good atom numbers. There is no need to
 
>> >add additional inforamtion on the atom name (at least on AMBER 8.0,
 
>> >maybe it changed for A9, but I don't see why)
 
>> >
 
>> >Good lick
 
>> >Jerome
 
>> >--
 
>> >Jerome Golebiowski, PhD
 
>> >LCMBA, team Chemometrics and Molecular Modeling
 
>> >University of Nice, parc Valrose
 
>> >06108 Nice Cedex2 France
 
>> >tel : +33 (0)4 92 07 61 03
 
>> >http://www.unice.fr/lcmba
 
>> >http://www.unice.fr/lcmba/golebiowski
 
>> >-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 
>> >The AMBER Mail Reflector
 
>> >To post, send mail to amber_at_scripps.edu
 
>> >To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo_at_scripps.edu
 
>>
 
>>_________________________________________________________________
 
>>Learn English via Shopping Game, FREE!
 
>>http://www.linguaphonenet.com/BannerTrack.asp?EMSCode=MSN06-03ETFJ-0211E
 
>>
 
>>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 
>>The AMBER Mail Reflector
 
>>To post, send mail to amber_at_scripps.edu
 
>>To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo_at_scripps.edu
 
>>
 
 _________________________________________________________________
 
No masks required! Use MSN Messenger to chat with friends and family. 
 
http://go.msnserver.com/HK/25382.asp
 
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------
 
The AMBER Mail Reflector
 
To post, send mail to amber_at_scripps.edu
 
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo_at_scripps.edu
 
 
  
 |