AMBER Archive (2005)Subject: Re: AMBER: amber8 parallel sander
From: Kathleen Erickson (kathleen_at_massivelyparallel.com)
Date: Thu Sep 22 2005 - 11:44:39 CDT
Peter: So are you saying that scaling efficiencies beyond 8 CPUs are better
achieved with NAMD? In other words, is 8 CPUs the limit for most
effiencient scaling on AMBER? I'd like to know at which point AMBER users
find they need to switch to NAMD or some other MD package. -Kathleen
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber_at_scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo_at_scripps.edu
|