AMBER Archive (2005)Subject: Re: AMBER: SHAKE error
From: Agata Jurkiewicz (aggresja_at_gmail.com) 
Date: Fri Jul 22 2005 - 12:01:16 CDT
 
 
 
 
Dear all, 
 
 Thank you for the hints. 
 
I've changed tautp to 0.1 and dt to 0.01, like in the following 
 
md.in file: 
 
 Amber 8, eqlbrtn, tighter T coupling, shorter timestep
 
  &cntrl
 
   imin=0, irest=1, ntx=7, ntp=1, nstlim= 25000,
 
    ntb=2, dt=0.001, ntt=1, temp0=300, tempi=300,
 
    ntpr=50, ntwr=500, scee=1.2, ntf=2, ntc=2,
 
    cut=12, ntwe=500, ntwx=500, ntave=5000, tautp=0.1,
 
  /
 
 and I got the same error: 
 
  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
  NSTEP =    11150   TIME(PS) =      61.150  TEMP(K) =   306.32  PRESS =  -230.4
 
 Etot   =     -5640.8341  EKtot   =      1331.5608  EPtot      =     -6972.3949
 
 BOND   =         4.0540  ANGLE   =        16.6087  DIHED      =        18.7644
 
 1-4 NB =         7.6254  1-4 EEL =      -110.2309  VDWAALS    =      1003.5220
 
 EELEC  =     -7912.7383  EHBOND  =         0.0000  RESTRAINT  =         0.0000
 
 EKCMT  =       678.7378  VIRIAL  =       813.9172  VOLUME     =     27177.9465
 
                                                    Density    =         0.8069
 
 Ewald error estimate:   0.2231E-03
 
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
  NSTEP =    11200   TIME(PS) =      61.200  TEMP(K) =   350.78  PRESS =    89.5
 
 Etot   =     -5152.2922  EKtot   =      1524.8442  EPtot      =     -6677.1364
 
 BOND   =         4.7864  ANGLE   =        18.1522  DIHED      =        17.5435
 
 1-4 NB =         7.3642  1-4 EEL =      -109.3920  VDWAALS    =       986.6305
 
 EELEC  =     -7602.2212  EHBOND  =         0.0000  RESTRAINT  =         0.0000
 
 EKCMT  =       718.5220  VIRIAL  =       666.0079  VOLUME     =     27162.1711
 
                                                    Density    =         0.8073
 
 Ewald error estimate:   0.6946E-02
 
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
  vlimit exceeded for step        11219 ; vmax =    90.6208338121492
 
 vlimit exceeded for step        11220 ; vmax =    24.0436241869450
 
 vlimit exceeded for step        11221 ; vmax =    21.0147137180043
 
 vlimit exceeded for step        11222 ; vmax =    29.6531277833188
 
 vlimit exceeded for step        11223 ; vmax =    29.2131390335408
 
 vlimit exceeded for step        11224 ; vmax =    22.7352810858752
 
 vlimit exceeded for step        11225 ; vmax =    20.9179801379055
 
 vlimit exceeded for step        11226 ; vmax =    21.0721474627654
 
 vlimit exceeded for step        11227 ; vmax =    24.1169069755573
 
 vlimit exceeded for step        11228 ; vmax =    20.2218187250374
 
 vlimit exceeded for step        11229 ; vmax =    22.7729449218372
 
 vlimit exceeded for step        11230 ; vmax =    23.5282680992668
 
 vlimit exceeded for step        11231 ; vmax =    22.9911654604639
 
 vlimit exceeded for step        11232 ; vmax =    21.8717438846248
 
 vlimit exceeded for step        11233 ; vmax =    21.1813303711289
 
 vlimit exceeded for step        11234 ; vmax =    20.2556438438652
 
 vlimit exceeded for step        11235 ; vmax =    31.9915759201488
 
 vlimit exceeded for step        11236 ; vmax =    20.7665550287679
 
 vlimit exceeded for step        11237 ; vmax =    21.2590661709873
 
 vlimit exceeded for step        11238 ; vmax =    20.7282912115994
 
 vlimit exceeded for step        11239 ; vmax =    20.4658103371141
 
 vlimit exceeded for step        11240 ; vmax =    20.5862925288465
 
 vlimit exceeded for step        11241 ; vmax =    20.3136359100207
 
 vlimit exceeded for step        11242 ; vmax =    20.1297329076364
 
 vlimit exceeded for step        11243 ; vmax =    22.3971345304708
 
      Coordinate resetting (SHAKE) was not accomplished
 
     within 3000 iterations
 
      Note: This is usually a symptom of some deeper
 
     problem with the energetics of the system.
 
 During the first 10 ps of this equilibrations, the temperature never
 
exceeds 310 K. It is after 10 ps when it starts to blow up.
 
I will try to heat the system slower, to remove the CM motions and so
 
on, but I am slowly running out of ideas...
 
 Best regards, 
 
Agata. 
 
 On 7/22/05, David A. Case <case_at_scripps.edu> wrote:
 
 > 
 
> Let me add to what Carlos said: you have a big step size (0.002) and still
 
> a low density (0.8) but a high temperature (480K).  This can readily lead
 
> to SHAKE failures.
 
> 
 
> A good prescription is to heat to a stable 300K at constant volume, then
 
> switch to constant pressure, not allowing the temperature to rise very much
 
> when you do that.  It is not all that uncommon for equilibrations to require
 
> shorter time steps (like .001), and smaller values for tautp.
 
> 
 
> ...good luck....dac
 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 
The AMBER Mail Reflector
 
To post, send mail to amber_at_scripps.edu
 
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo_at_scripps.edu
 
 
  
 |