AMBER Archive (2005)Subject: Re: AMBER:
From: Zhiguo Liu (zgleo_at_tom.com)
Date: Sat Jul 09 2005 - 03:39:43 CDT
Dear glc0358,
Most of time this is because you have used an improper topology pdb file to parse your trajectory, e.g., the trajectory has water included, whereas your topology pdb file includes only protein, or vice versa. In a word, your topology file should be corresponding to your trajectory file.
Zhiguo Liu
2005-7-9
___________________________________________
Zhiguo Liu
Ph.D candidate
Drug Discovery and Design Center
Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica
Chinese Academy of Science
Shanghai, China
zhiguo.leo_at_gmail.com
___________________________________________
----- 2005-07-09, 15:03:23, glc0358 wrote -----
AMBER:
>Hi all.
>I'm using amber7 for md simulation. I created a GDP molecule and simulated it in explicit water. The minimization step is OK, however, when I ran md with SANDER and visualized the trajectory with vmd, I found that the system became into a mass, the bonds were stretched to terrible long.
>To diagnose the reason, I tried the example of polyA-T tutorial, the same phenomena appeared. At the same time, the data in mdout file seemed stable, but was different with tutorial.
>I checked the FAQ,I'm not sure whether it was the so-called blowup. Could anyone tell me why?
>Thanks
>
>Linchen Gong
>department of physics
>Tsinghua University
>______________________________________
>
>===================================================================
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>The AMBER Mail Reflector
>To post, send mail to amber_at_scripps.edu
>To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo_at_scripps.edu
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber_at_scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo_at_scripps.edu
|