AMBER Archive (2005)Subject: Re: AMBER: big fluctuation in MM-PBSA/GA
From: Eric Hu (eric.y.hu_at_gmail.com) 
Date: Thu Apr 14 2005 - 19:21:40 CDT
 
 
 
 
Here we are talking about a small difference between two big numbers
 
which  fluctuate so much that the difference is not significant any
 
more at each individual snapshot. I agree that the standard error in
 
the mean is probably more useful from the perspective of statistics
 
and probability. In this case the SD for PBTOT is 0.22 kcal/mol.
 
Therefore the PBTOT can be reported as -9.4 +/- 0.2 kcal/mol. What
 
about the confidence level? I assume that the distribution curve is
 
really flat...
 
 Eric
 
 On 4/14/05, David A. Case <case_at_scripps.edu> wrote:
 
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2005, Eric Hu wrote:
 
> > #                    DELTA
 
> > #          -----------------------
 
> > #                  MEAN        STD
 
> > #          =======================
 
> > ELE              -14.20      28.32
 
> > VDW              -37.03       7.62
 
> > INT                0.01       0.02
 
> > GAS              -51.21      32.31
 
> > PBSUR             -4.00       0.76
 
> > PBCAL             45.81      32.31
 
> > PBSOL             41.82      31.85
 
> > PBELE             31.61       9.06
 
> > PBTOT             -9.40       6.93
 
> > GBSUR             -5.75       1.10
 
> > GB                41.98      27.46
 
> > GBSOL             36.23      26.85
 
> > GBELE             27.79       4.27
 
> > GBTOT            -14.99       7.54
 
> >
 
> > The data here are not usable since the STD is bigger that the actual
 
> > value.
 
> 
 
> Sorry, I don't see where the standard deviations are too high(?).  I'm pretty
 
> sure that MMPBSA is reporting the mean and standard deviation of the
 
> distribution of values for each snapshot.  If you want to estimate the
 
> standard error in the mean, you would have to divide the STD number by the
 
> square root of the number of independent samples you have.  If the snapshots
 
> are widely separated in time (by more that a few tenths of a picosecond,
 
> generally), you can take the number of independent samples to be about equal
 
> to the number of snapshots.
 
> 
 
> So, the estimated error in the PBTOT or GBTOT numbers is probably pretty
 
> small.  So, if you had 100 snapshots, the estimated error in the mean value of
 
> GBTOT or PBTOT would be less than 1 kcal/mol.
 
> 
 
> (All these are "statistical errors", of course, assuming that you indeed have
 
> a well equilibrated system.  The actual errors, arising from deficiencies in
 
> the force field, and in the continuum solvent model itself, will generally be
 
> much larger than this.)
 
> 
 
> ...dac
 
> 
 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
 
> The AMBER Mail Reflector
 
> To post, send mail to amber_at_scripps.edu
 
> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo_at_scripps.edu
 
>
 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 
The AMBER Mail Reflector
 
To post, send mail to amber_at_scripps.edu
 
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo_at_scripps.edu
 
 
  
 |