| AMBER Archive (2005)Subject: Re: AMBER: Formatting Questions
From: Bill Ross (ross_at_cgl.ucsf.edu)Date: Tue Feb 22 2005 - 18:03:26 CST
 
 
 
 
> My ligand is a rather rigid structure.
 You might want to look at the porphyrin model. This looks like
info I collated in the mid-90's, perhaps there is something
 newer:
 
   http://www.chem.neu.edu/web/Course/Chm3620/AMBER/Web/ff91_porphyrin.html
 It would be interesting to see if the electrostatic/vdw interactions
are sufficient to hold the Ni in place. If not, the choice is between
 restraints or an explicit bond. Simple distance restraints could be
 convenient in that they would save the trouble of coming up with
 angle and torsion parameters, although it might be harder to achieve
 rigidity. My guess is that you'd have to create your own nitrogen
 atom type if you go the bonding route.
 
 Bill
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 The AMBER Mail Reflector
 To post, send mail to amber_at_scripps.edu
 To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo_at_scripps.edu
 
 
 
 |