AMBER Archive (2004)

Subject: Re: AMBER: Close contact warnings

From: Michael George Lerner (mlerner_at_umich.edu)
Date: Wed Feb 18 2004 - 07:58:50 CST


Hi,

I missed the first bit of this discussion, so I don't know what molecule
you're working with, but .. what is the atom type of H54? Does it have
any van der Waals parameters? It's possible that it has a charge, but no
van der Waals parameter, which would cause the H and O to want to sit on
top of eachother. Note that your VDWAALS energy hasn't changed much
between 388 and 389, but it certainly *should* if the H and O are directly
on top of eachother.

When I ran into this problem, I was actually able just ignore the
Hydrogen. If you can't do that, you probably want to give it a small van
der Waals parameter.

Then again, like I said, I missed the first bit of this discussion, so I
might be completely wrong :).

-michael

--
This isn't a democracy;|                        _  |Michael Lerner
 it's a cheer-ocracy.  | ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) |   Michigan
-Torrence,  Bring It On|  - against HTML email  X  |  Biophysics
                       |                       / \ | mlerner_at_umich

On Wed, 18 Feb 2004, L Jin wrote:

> I checked the output file carefully and found that from step 388 to 389 > something strange happened: > > > NSTEP ENERGY RMS GMAX NAME NUMBER > 388 -1.5636E+02 4.2407E+00 1.7222E+01 H54 51 > > BOND = 11.7069 ANGLE = 77.0644 DIHED = 51.9480 > VDWAALS = -11.8319 EEL = -312.5510 HBOND = 0.0000 > 1-4 VDW = 12.5818 1-4 EEL = 14.7250 RESTRAINT = 0.0000 > > > NSTEP ENERGY RMS GMAX NAME NUMBER > 389 -1.0020E+01 7.7049E+01 4.4229E+02 H54 51 > > BOND = 161.0069 ANGLE = 168.0122 DIHED = 51.8140 > VDWAALS = -12.2718 EEL = -303.3282 HBOND = 0.0000 > 1-4 VDW = 12.8826 1-4 EEL = -88.1358 RESTRAINT = 0.0000 > > > I ran another 440 steps minimization just before the clash one (step 448). I got > the pdb file from the restrt and prmtop and loaded it to xleap. I found that H54 > and O41 become one point, which should be two seperated atoms. This tendency > happened from step 389. I do not know why it happened. Is there any method to > avoid this? Thanks a lot. > > Lan > > > > > > > > > > Quoting "David A. Case" <case_at_scripps.edu>: > > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2004, L Jin wrote: > > > > > > minimization with sander (Amber7) > > > &cntrl > > > imin = 1, maxcyc = 500, drms = 0.0005, ntb = 0, > > > ntpr = 1, cut = 999., ncyc = 100, > > > &end > > > > Have you looked visually at your molecule? Clearly, something very unusual > > is going on. You converge smoothly to a total energy of around -146 at > > step 329, with an rms gradient that is not too large: > > > > > > > > > NSTEP ENERGY RMS GMAX NAME NUMBER > > > 329 -1.4583E+02 1.1848E+00 4.6123E+00 C31 42 > > > > > > BOND = 4.5116 ANGLE = 48.5651 DIHED = > > 44.7987 > > > VDWAALS = -11.6564 EEL = -312.0418 HBOND = > > 0.0000 > > > 1-4 VDW = 12.4566 1-4 EEL = 67.5408 RESTRAINT = > > 0.0000 > > > > > Then something bad happens by step 445; the energy has risen to 0.6, and > > the rms gradient is up to 49. Note that the bond energy especially is > > now very high: > > > > > NSTEP ENERGY RMS GMAX NAME NUMBER > > > 445 5.9643E-01 4.9484E+01 3.4419E+02 O41 48 > > > > > > BOND = 118.4773 ANGLE = 120.6025 DIHED = > > 53.2918 > > > VDWAALS = -12.3050 EEL = -305.5181 HBOND = > > 0.0000 > > > 1-4 VDW = 12.2175 1-4 EEL = 13.8304 RESTRAINT = > > 0.0000 > > > > > > > After this, things get very bad quickly, with some 1-4 contact getting > > very short: > > > > > > > > NSTEP ENERGY RMS GMAX NAME NUMBER > > > 446 -2.5247E+03 7.9332E+03 5.2102E+04 O41 48 > > > > > > BOND = 119.2712 ANGLE = 146.2262 DIHED = > > 52.5048 > > > VDWAALS = -12.2562 EEL = -302.8007 HBOND = > > 0.0000 > > > 1-4 VDW = 12.4022 1-4 EEL = -2540.0104 RESTRAINT = > > 0.0000 > > > > > > > > > NSTEP ENERGY RMS GMAX NAME NUMBER > > > 447 -3.0601E+05 1.0647E+08 8.2860E+08 H54 51 > > > > > > BOND = 120.7894 ANGLE = 148.1497 DIHED = > > 52.4627 > > > VDWAALS = -12.2550 EEL = -302.7370 HBOND = > > 0.0000 > > > 1-4 VDW = 12.4228 1-4 EEL = -306025.0251 RESTRAINT = > > 0.0000 > > > > > > > > > NSTEP ENERGY RMS GMAX NAME NUMBER > > > 448 -3.1064E+05 1.0972E+08 8.2030E+08 H54 51 > > > > > > BOND = 120.7918 ANGLE = 148.1526 DIHED = > > 52.4626 > > > VDWAALS = -12.2549 EEL = -302.7369 HBOND = > > 0.0000 > > > 1-4 VDW = 12.4228 1-4 EEL = -310660.0186 RESTRAINT = > > 0.0000 > > > > > > You need to examine your structure carefully (especially around > > atom H54, or maybe around atom O41). I suspect you have something > > "non-chemical" going on. > > > > ...regards...dac > > > > -- > > > > ================================================================== > > David A. Case | e-mail: case_at_scripps.edu > > Dept. of Molecular Biology, TPC15 | fax: +1-858-784-8896 > > The Scripps Research Institute | phone: +1-858-784-9768 > > 10550 N. Torrey Pines Rd. | home page: > > La Jolla CA 92037 USA | http://www.scripps.edu/case > > ================================================================== > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > The AMBER Mail Reflector > > To post, send mail to amber_at_scripps.edu > > To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo_at_scripps.edu > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > The AMBER Mail Reflector > To post, send mail to amber_at_scripps.edu > To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo_at_scripps.edu > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- The AMBER Mail Reflector To post, send mail to amber_at_scripps.edu To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo_at_scripps.edu