AMBER Archive (2009)

Subject: Re: [AMBER] question about failures

From: Jason Swails (jason.swails_at_gmail.com)
Date: Mon Dec 07 2009 - 22:51:28 CST

All but one of these differences seem benign. The tip5p test, however, is
slightly disconcerting since it doesn't appear that any output was created
by the test run comparable to that blip that's printed in
TEST_FAILURES.dif. If you plan on using that solvent model, I'd check out
that test case a little more carefully.

Good luck!
Jason

On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 10:37 PM, peker milas <pekermilas_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear Amber users,
>
> I recently installed AmberTools 1.2 and Amber 10 to a pc. Just for now
> it is serial but i m planning to make it parallel in a very near
> future. At the same time i had some test failures. I will attach my
> test failures file to this email. My question is about those failures.
> If anybody can explain me whether they are crucial or not also whether
> i should fix them i will be very happy.
>
> Thank you so much
> peker
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER_at_ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
> 

-- 
---------------------------------------
Jason M. Swails
Quantum Theory Project,
University of Florida
Ph.D. Graduate Student
352-392-4032
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER_at_ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber