AMBER Archive (2009)
Subject: Re: [AMBER] Re: AMBER: periodic bondary condition

From: case (case_at_biomaps.rutgers.edu)
Date: Fri Oct 16 2009 - 08:13:49 CDT

Previous message: Cenk \(Jenk\) Andac: "[AMBER] MMTSB cluster analysis versus ptraj cluster analysis"
In reply to: Markus Kaukonen: "[AMBER] Re: AMBER: periodic bondary condition"
Next in thread: Markus Kaukonen: "Re: [AMBER] Re: AMBER: periodic bondary condition"
Reply: Markus Kaukonen: "Re: [AMBER] Re: AMBER: periodic bondary condition"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Oct 16, 2009, Markus Kaukonen wrote:
>
> Is a covalent bond across a periodic boundary still impossible with Amber?

Yes (i.e. still not supported).

...dac

_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER_at_ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber

Previous message: Cenk \(Jenk\) Andac: "[AMBER] MMTSB cluster analysis versus ptraj cluster analysis"
In reply to: Markus Kaukonen: "[AMBER] Re: AMBER: periodic bondary condition"
Next in thread: Markus Kaukonen: "Re: [AMBER] Re: AMBER: periodic bondary condition"
Reply: Markus Kaukonen: "Re: [AMBER] Re: AMBER: periodic bondary condition"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]