AMBER Archive (2009)

Subject: Re: [AMBER] ptraj failure to parse psf input

From: Sasha Buzko (obuzko_at_ucla.edu)
Date: Wed Aug 05 2009 - 14:33:54 CDT

So I assume that the "1.1" message was just a leftover from the previous
version of the code that didn't get corrected...

But since this version still can't read the PSF file that I attached in
the last post, could someone in the development team take a look at it?
Thanks in advance

Sasha

case wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 05, 2009, Sasha Buzko wrote:
>
>> A side question: I assume that the downloadable AmberTools release is in
>> fact 1.2, since there is no mention of it anywhere in the content
>> (docs/changelog refer to 1.0, installation ends with a reference to
>> 1.1). Is this a case of documentation that didn't get updated or
>> (hopefully, not) the incorrect version packaged for download?
>>
>
> The final message that says "1.1" should indeed say "1.2". You have the
> correct file.
>
> ...dac
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER_at_ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER_at_ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber