AMBER Archive (2009)

Subject: Re: [AMBER] Simulated annealing

• Previous message: Ignacio J. General: "Re: [AMBER] Partial interactions"
• In reply to: waleed zalloum: "[AMBER] Simulated annealing"
• Next in thread: waleed zalloum: "Re: [AMBER] Simulated annealing"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

hard to say without knowing more details. is it a standard system, or
modified force field?
did it go up in a continuation run, or a new run? what were the energies like?
at high T you may well need smaller time steps (2fs or 0.5fs).
also be VERY careful at 1000K, you will almost certainly need
restraints on amides, chirality and so on. details depend on your
molecule, but don't expect any chiral centers or cis/trans double
bonds to stay the same at that temperature.

On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 10:31 AM, waleed zalloum
<waleed_zalloum_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
> Dear Amber users,
>
> I am running simulated annealing, In my input file I heat the system up to 1000K and then cool it slowly. It was running well, but today I used the same input file and the temperature keeps going up to many thousands of K (~ 10000K).
>
> Anyone faced such a problem?
>
> Thank you in advance
>
> Waleed
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER_at_ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>

_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER_at_ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber

• Previous message: Ignacio J. General: "Re: [AMBER] Partial interactions"
• In reply to: waleed zalloum: "[AMBER] Simulated annealing"
• Next in thread: waleed zalloum: "Re: [AMBER] Simulated annealing"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]