AMBER Archive (2009)

Subject: Re: [AMBER] Right force fields

• Previous message: Beale, John: "[AMBER] radius of gyration"
• In reply to: Vikas Sharma: "[AMBER] Right force fields"
• Next in thread: Vikas Sharma: "Re: [AMBER] Right force fields"
• Reply: Vikas Sharma: "Re: [AMBER] Right force fields"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi Vikas,

I can't remember having seen a publication that actually shows
that ff03 and gaff are 'compatible' in terms of charges.

As long as this has not been published I would not use ff03.
 
However, this is just an opinion, and not the final experts one.

Patrick

Vikas Sharma wrote:
>
> Dear All,
> I use xleap.
> The force fields which I use are gaff & ff03..
> I am working on MM PBSA.
>
> Am i Using the right combination of force fields?
>
> I just wanted to know that while running antechamber which charges(RESP or BCC) should i use with which force fields?
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Connect with friends all over the world. Get Yahoo! India Messenger at http://in.messenger.yahoo.com/?wm=n/
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER_at_ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
>

_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER_at_ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber

• Previous message: Beale, John: "[AMBER] radius of gyration"
• In reply to: Vikas Sharma: "[AMBER] Right force fields"
• Next in thread: Vikas Sharma: "Re: [AMBER] Right force fields"
• Reply: Vikas Sharma: "Re: [AMBER] Right force fields"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]