AMBER Archive (2009)Subject: [AMBER] Umbrella test
From: Arnaud (arnaud_at_lcc-toulouse.fr)
Date: Thu Apr 02 2009 - 04:51:01 CDT
Hello,
I runed umbrella sampling with amber8 and amber10 with the parameters file
given in amber manual :
************************************
test of umbrella sampling of a chi torsion angle
&cntrl
nstlim=50000, cut=20.0, igb=1, saltcon=0.1,
ntpr=1, ntwr=100000, ntt=3, gamma_ln=0.2,
ntx=5, irest=1,
ntc=2, ntf=2, tol=0.000001,
dt=0.001, ntb=0,
nmropt=1,
/
&wt type='DUMPFREQ', istep1=10 /
&wt type='END' /
DISANG=chi.RST
DUMPAVE=chi_vs_t.170
EOF
**************************************
chi.RST, prmtop and md4.x files needed for this calculation were those
proposed in test directory of amber package.
Begin and end results in chi_vs_t.170 file obtained with amber10 were :
0 28.408
10 76.692
20 103.804
30 106.999
40 101.039
50 93.077
60 109.138
70 119.145
80 142.406
90 133.365
100 128.226
110 117.133
...
49900 169.076
49910 171.938
49920 170.164
49930 170.135
49940 170.565
49950 171.870
49960 173.956
49970 172.371
49980 172.124
49990 170.298
Begin and end results in chi_vs_t.170 obtained with amber8 were :
0 28.408
10 76.756
20 103.865
30 107.183
40 101.340
50 94.314
60 109.482
70 119.648
80 141.769
90 132.950
100 128.029
110 118.266
...
49900 166.738
49910 162.640
49920 166.876
49930 172.380
49940 173.665
49950 167.582
49960 163.551
49970 166.160
49980 166.259
49990 164.893
*******************************
Why these differences of results ?
P.S :I also runed this test for amber9 and in this case results were
identical to those obtained with amber10
Best regards,
Philippe
___________________________________________________________________
CNRS / Laboratoire de Chimie de Coordination
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER_at_ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
|