AMBER Archive (2009)

Subject: Re: [AMBER] Ramesh here

From: kureeckal ramesh (kureeckalramesh_at_yahoo.co.in)
Date: Sat Feb 28 2009 - 09:36:43 CST


Dear Francois
I thank you for your valuable suggestions about using R.E.D. III and am currently working on the tutorials

With warm regards
Ramesh K V 
--- On Sat, 28/2/09, FyD <fyd_at_q4md-forcefieldtools.org> wrote:
From: FyD <fyd_at_q4md-forcefieldtools.org>
Subject: Re: [AMBER] Ramesh here
To: amber_at_ambermd.org
Date: Saturday, 28 February, 2009, 7:15 PM

Dear Ramesh K V,

Be insured that concerned people have understood you had nothing to do with
this "unfriendly" message. A "spam" ? It looks like someone
or something needed to release its frustration and/or to pass a message using
the reflector system. Anyway, this is not a big deal...

If we go back to your question & if you do use a PC, PC-GAMESS might be a
good bet as it is fast with its various mpi implementations for multi-cpu jobs.
With the R.E.D.-III.1 tools version, Ante_R.E.D. generates now specific inputs
for PC-GAMESS & GAMESS-US, and we implemented the differences between
PC-GAMESS & GAMESS-US in R.E.D.-III.1. If you have a Mac, R.E.D.-III.1 will
work with PC-GAMESS (through wine) or with GAMESS-US, and RESP obviously (thanks
to the work of T. Patko).

Anyway, if you decide to use the R.E.D. tools, do not hesitate to ask questions
in the Amber or q4md-forcefieldtools mailing list.

regards, Francois

> Hi
> When I opened up my mail, I was totally surprised to see the message sent
by unknown person in my mailbox (referring to anger / dissatisfied email).
>
> As pointed out by Mr Raviprasad, this could be a SPAM, and was NOT SENT
by me. This is also very clear as my email ID does not match with above
mentioned sender's email ID. 
>
> I have got highest respect for the experts who are working with utmost
sincerity for providing solutions on AMBER.
>
> Hope such types of SPAM messages can be avoided in future..
>
> Bye
> Ramesh K V
>
> --- On Sat, 28/2/09, David Watson <dewatson_at_olemiss.edu> wrote:
> From: David Watson <dewatson_at_olemiss.edu>
> Subject: Re: [AMBER] Re: Antechamber
> To: "AMBER Mailing List" <amber_at_ambermd.org>
> Date: Saturday, 28 February, 2009, 3:31 AM
>
> I think it is time to bring an end to this discussion, per private emails
with
> other members.
>
> This was all a misunderstanding that arose because a poster responded to
an
> ongoing thread instead of the original thread that they had started, as
you
> correctly surmised.
>
> I should have paid more attention to that fact before I responded the way
I
> did, and for that I apologize.
>
> Thanks
>
> On Feb 27, 2009, at 2:44 PM, rpaduri_at_chem.wayne.edu wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> It is strange that someone ridicules such an expert's advice on
> "Antechamber"
>> and "RED". Just being curious, I was going through the
> sender's e-mail ID and to
>> me the second e-mail (the anger/dissatisfied e-mail) looks like some
kind
> of a
>> SPAM since the sender's e-mail's don't match (from the
initial
> question posed to
>> the response e-mail to FyD's answer).Hopefully, Mr. Ramesh can
clarify
> this.
>> Sincerely
>> Raviprasad Aduri
>>
>> Quoting David Watson <dewatson_at_olemiss.edu>:
>>
>>> On Feb 27, 2009, at 8:00 AM, null wrote:
>>>
>>>> Who are you ?I can't understand you. I need help of
> professions
>>>> about amber, my problem haven't been solved ,if you
can't
> help
>>>> me,please not reply.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I can understand your frustration, but you must understand that
the
>>> answer that was given was pertinent to your question.
>>> If you need professional help so badly, then why don't you PAY
FyD
> for
>>> the same information that was so generously provided for free.
>>> If you can't understand the English language, then perhaps you
> should
>>> ask someone who speaks your language for help, and stop insulting
the
>>> professionals on this list.
>>>
>>> Your animosity is truly unwelcome.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> 在2009-02-27,FyD <fyd_at_q4md-forcefieldtools.org>
写道:
>>>>
>>>> Dear kureeckal ramesh,
>>>>
>>>>> 1) Is there any alternative to Gaussian package, which can
> generate
>>>>> files (Please refer the note below) as recommended in
AMBER10
>>>>> tutorial ? (Name of the package which can be downloaded
free
> for
>>>>> academic purpose will be fine)..
>>>>
>>>> You can use R.E.D. @ http://q4md-forcefieldtools.org/RED/
>>>> that interfaces GAMESS-US http://www.msg.ameslab.gov/GAMESS/
or
>>>> PC-GAMESS http://classic.chem.msu.su/gran/gamess/
>>>>
>>>> R.E.D. Server http://q4md-forcefieldtools.org/REDS/ will
provide
> you
>>>> access to the last version of Gaussian/GAMESS-US/PC-GAMESS...
>>>>
>>>> regards, Francois

_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER_at_ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber

      Connect with friends all over the world. Get Yahoo! India Messenger at http://in.messenger.yahoo.com/?wm=n/
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER_at_ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber