AMBER Archive (2009)

Subject: [AMBER] Ramesh here

From: kureeckal ramesh (kureeckalramesh_at_yahoo.co.in)
Date: Fri Feb 27 2009 - 21:20:49 CST

Hi
When I opened up my mail, I was totally surprised to see the message sent by unknown person in my mailbox (referring to anger / dissatisfied email).

As pointed out by Mr Raviprasad, this could be a SPAM, and was NOT SENT by me. This is also very clear as my email ID does not match with above mentioned sender's email ID. 

I have got highest respect for the experts who are working with utmost sincerity for providing solutions on AMBER.

Hope such types of SPAM messages can be avoided in future..

Bye
Ramesh K V

--- On Sat, 28/2/09, David Watson <dewatson_at_olemiss.edu> wrote:
From: David Watson <dewatson_at_olemiss.edu>
Subject: Re: [AMBER] Re: Antechamber
To: "AMBER Mailing List" <amber_at_ambermd.org>
Date: Saturday, 28 February, 2009, 3:31 AM

I think it is time to bring an end to this discussion, per private emails with
other members.

This was all a misunderstanding that arose because a poster responded to an
ongoing thread instead of the original thread that they had started, as you
correctly surmised.

I should have paid more attention to that fact before I responded the way I
did, and for that I apologize.

Thanks

On Feb 27, 2009, at 2:44 PM, rpaduri_at_chem.wayne.edu wrote:

> Hi all,
> It is strange that someone ridicules such an expert's advice on
"Antechamber"
> and "RED". Just being curious, I was going through the
sender's e-mail ID and to
> me the second e-mail (the anger/dissatisfied e-mail) looks like some kind
of a
> SPAM since the sender's e-mail's don't match (from the initial
question posed to
> the response e-mail to FyD's answer).Hopefully, Mr. Ramesh can clarify
this.
> Sincerely
> Raviprasad Aduri
>
> Quoting David Watson <dewatson_at_olemiss.edu>:
>
>> On Feb 27, 2009, at 8:00 AM, null wrote:
>>
>>> Who are you ?I can't understand you. I need help of
professions
>>> about amber, my problem haven't been solved ,if you can't
help
>>> me,please not reply.
>>>
>>
>> I can understand your frustration, but you must understand that the
>> answer that was given was pertinent to your question.
>> If you need professional help so badly, then why don't you PAY FyD
for
>> the same information that was so generously provided for free.
>> If you can't understand the English language, then perhaps you
should
>> ask someone who speaks your language for help, and stop insulting the
>> professionals on this list.
>>
>> Your animosity is truly unwelcome.
>>
>>>
>>> 在2009-02-27，FyD <fyd_at_q4md-forcefieldtools.org> 写道：
>>>
>>> Dear kureeckal ramesh,
>>>
>>>> 1) Is there any alternative to Gaussian package, which can
generate
>>>> files (Please refer the note below) as recommended in AMBER10
>>>> tutorial ? (Name of the package which can be downloaded free
for
>>>> academic purpose will be fine)..
>>>
>>> You can use R.E.D. @ http://q4md-forcefieldtools.org/RED/
>>> that interfaces GAMESS-US http://www.msg.ameslab.gov/GAMESS/ or
>>> PC-GAMESS http://classic.chem.msu.su/gran/gamess/
>>>
>>> R.E.D. Server http://q4md-forcefieldtools.org/REDS/ will provide
you
>>> access to the last version of Gaussian/GAMESS-US/PC-GAMESS...
>>>
>>> regards, Francois

_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER_at_ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber

      Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER_at_ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber