AMBER Archive (2008)

Subject: Re: AMBER: antechamber bug? produces incorrect NEWPDB.PDB file

From: David A. Case (case_at_biomaps.rutgers.edu)
Date: Tue Oct 28 2008 - 12:57:49 CDT

On Tue, Oct 28, 2008, David A. Case wrote:

> > But something in antechamber is moving those prefix numbers into the
> > alternate location field of NEWPDB.PDB

Oops...I guess my previous post missed the problem that the atom names in the
NEWPDB.PDB file might be in the wrong columns. This should be fixed, (although
I must say that I have never made use of the NEWPDB.PDB file, and am not even
sure why it is written out.)

Sorry for the confusion...dac

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber_at_scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" (in the *body* of the email)
      to majordomo_at_scripps.edu