| AMBER Archive (2008)Subject: RE: AMBER: F modified RNA is split in two parts when running sander simulated annealing
From: Peter Podbevšek (Peter.Podbevsek_at_ki.si)Date: Thu Oct 02 2008 - 08:08:51 CDT
 
 
 
 
Andreas thank you for replying. I'm kind of new at this so all the fluorine parameters look fine to me. I got the partial charger from literature and all the other parameters were already included in the force field. Are there some special parameters for GB that I'm missing?
I did some more experimenting and found out that the problem is somehow related to the electrostatic terms of the potential function (with a 0.1 weight on ELEC simulations finish without problems).
 
 Here is an image of the problematic molecule if it looks familiar to someone. This happens on a timescale of around 100 fs. 
http://www2.arnes.si/~ssdppodb/amber.jpg
 
 Regards
Peter
 
 -----Original Message-----
From: owner-amber_at_scripps.edu [mailto:owner-amber_at_scripps.edu] On Behalf Of Andreas Svrcek-Seiler
 Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 11:57 AM
 To: amber_at_scripps.edu
 Subject: Re: AMBER: F modified RNA is split in two parts when running sander simulated annealing
 
 Hi,
> ======================================================================
 > =========
 >
 > NSTEP =    11938   TIME(PS) =       5.969  TEMP(K) =431725.07  PRESS =     0.0
 > Etot   =            NaN  EKtot   =   1562702.1324  EPtot      =            NaN
 > BOND   =       977.0778  ANGLE   =      1738.1119  DIHED      =      1303.8070
 > 1-4 NB =       431.4051  1-4 EEL =     -4741.3679  VDWAALS    =      -668.7301
 > EELEC  =      3396.5918  EGB     =            NaN  RESTRAINT  =       160.1925
 > EAMBER (non-restraint)  =            NaN
 > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 > --------
 ...Since here only EGB is broken I guess the underlying problem is an effectove Born radius becoming <= zero.
 
 You mention that this is more likely at higher temperatures, so this probably happens when some atoms get very close (closer than Lennard-Jones repulsion or a bond between them would allow at 300K).
 Since this happens with Flourine-modified DNA I further guess that the Flouride (GB-)parameters are part of the problem.
 I hope this guesswork helps,
good luck
 Andreas
 
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
 To post, send mail to amber_at_scripps.edu
 To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" (in the *body* of the email)
 to majordomo_at_scripps.edu
 
 No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
 Version: 8.0.173 / Virus Database: 270.7.5/1701 - Release Date: 30.9.2008 19:08
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------
 The AMBER Mail Reflector
 To post, send mail to amber_at_scripps.edu
 To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" (in the *body* of the email)
 to majordomo_at_scripps.edu
 
 
 
 |