AMBER Archive (2008)

Subject: Re: AMBER: Compilation of amber8 patched with ramd

From: David A. Case (case_at_scripps.edu)
Date: Tue Jun 24 2008 - 17:06:15 CDT

On Tue, Jun 24, 2008, Francesco Pietra wrote:

> Running the general serial test for amber8, all PASSED except
> newton_raph (forrtl: severe (174) segmentation fault). That likely
> because no bugfix was applied (and it can't) to amber8 before patching
> with ramd. I was unable to trace what newton_raph is expected to do,
> so that may I ask whether this is a problem for running ramd?

As I understand it, RAMD is a modification to *sander*, and newton_raph
is an *nmode* test. They are complete separate executables.

...dac

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber_at_scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" (in the *body* of the email)
      to majordomo_at_scripps.edu