|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMBER Archive (2008)Subject: Re: AMBER: AMD Opteron: compiler recommendations?
From: Robert Duke (rduke_at_email.unc.edu)
The pathscale compilers are pretty good for opterons; the pgi compilers are used for cray machines running opterons, so they must not be too bad on performance either, though there has been grief with pgi from time to time (in fairness, they have tried to fix their problems, so I should give them credit for responding to the past problems). With intel, it may be a specific switches problem; I last tried running them on opterons a couple of years ago. I preferred pathscale for the opteron, but there was not a 30% performance differential at that point in time (things could have changed). It is completely possible that my default ifort settings for the opteron are no longer the best choice (sorry, I just didn't get around to trying this combination in the current release cycle).
Hi all,
Has anyone had any experience with comparing performance of binaries built using different compilers on AMD hardware? For instance, how do Pathscale compilers compare to Intel on Opterons? I've read reports about the evil Intel intentionally under-optimizing code on non-Intel chips, but hope it's not the issue here :).
Any recommendations and/or benchmark results would be very much appreciated.
Thanks in advance
Sasha
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|