AMBER Archive (2007)

Subject: Re: AMBER: amber9/mmtsb

From: David A. Case (case_at_scripps.edu)
Date: Tue Dec 18 2007 - 09:59:11 CST

On Tue, Dec 18, 2007, Francesco Pietra wrote:

> On looking for the way to carry out cluster analysis (of the type of
> tutorial B3) with Amber 9, I was unable to find documentation for MMTSB in
> combination with Amber 9. Amber proposes a patch for Amber 8, while the
> MMTSB web site only refers to CHARMM. Should Amber 9 be recompiled with
> MMTSB?

I don't understand: the clustering in mmtsb just uses pdb files as inputs.
It shouldn't matter where the pdb files come from: amber 8 or amber 9, or
charmm.

What happened when you did your clustering using Amber 9?

...dac

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber_at_scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo_at_scripps.edu