|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMBER Archive (2007)Subject: Re: AMBER: Test fails in Parallel version Amber9
From: gong wb (bnmrcamber_at_gmail.com)
Dear Scott,
--- > Etot = -3538.3784 EKtot = 478.2764 EPtot = -4016.6548 180c180 < EELEC = -18.4200 EGB = -2503.6434 RESTRAINT = 3.6286 --- > EELEC = -18.4199 EGB = -2503.6434 RESTRAINT = 3.6286 --------------------------------------- possible FAILURE: check rem.log.dif /public/amber9/test/rem_gb_4rep 26c26 < 2 1.15 234.76 -3.24 300.00 400.00 0.80 --- > 2 1.15 261.02 -4.61 300.00 400.00 0.80 --------------------------------------- possible FAILURE: check reminfo.000.dif /public/amber9/test/rem_gb_4rep 16,20c16,20 < NSTEP = 100 TIME(PS) = 100.800 TEMP(K) = 234.76 PRESS = 0. < Etot = 21.0164 EKtot = 24.2585 EPtot = -3.2421 < BOND = 14.3725 ANGLE = 19.8208 DIHED = 25.4361 < 1-4 NB = 5.7103 1-4 EEL = 182.5250 VDWAALS = -5.9319 < EELEC = -213.6574 EGB = -31.5175 RESTRAINT = 0. --- > NSTEP = 100 TIME(PS) = 100.800 TEMP(K) = 261.02 PRESS = 0. > Etot = 22.3628 EKtot = 26.9719 EPtot = -4.6092 > BOND = 14.9791 ANGLE = 17.9986 DIHED = 25.4386 > 1-4 NB = 5.6257 1-4 EEL = 182.4183 VDWAALS = -5.8981 > EELEC = -213.4152 EGB = -31.7563 RESTRAINT = 0. --------------------------------------- And now, we can say that the last two possible failure is reproducible. How can we figure them out? ----------------------------------------------------------------------- The AMBER Mail Reflector To post, send mail to amber_at_scripps.edu To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo_at_scripps.edu
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|