AMBER Archive (2007)

Subject: Re: AMBER: antechamber question

From: David A. Case (case_at_scripps.edu)
Date: Sun May 20 2007 - 09:44:18 CDT

On Sun, May 20, 2007, Francesco Pietra wrote:
>
> I am no Gaussian user, though my QM suite provides ESP
> RESP and CRESP very reliably at HF-6-31G* level, with
> check of dipole moments for fragment ensemble vs the
> intact whole. That said, would antechamber be viable
> by providing that way the Partial Charges? I would
> like to become an Amber user if that is possible.

Antechamber works well with RESP charges, no matter where they come from. You
might have to enter some values by hand if you don't use Gaussian.

...hope this helps....dac

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber_at_scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo_at_scripps.edu