AMBER Archive (2007)

Subject: Re: AMBER: bug in reprocessing with PB?

• Next message: Geoff Wood: "Re: AMBER: hybrid remd"
• Previous message: David Mobley: "Re: AMBER: bug in reprocessing with PB?"
• In reply to: David A. Case: "Re: AMBER: bug in reprocessing with PB?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

All,

Sorry, here's the attachment.

David

On 5/10/07, David A. Case <case_at_scripps.edu> wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2007, David Mobley wrote:
>
> > However, I'm attaching a tarball for one case that fails
> > (with PB) on either architecture. Again, it reprocesses fine using GB.
>
> Nothing was attached(!?!).
>
> Ray: if you or your people can look at this, it would be great: we need to
> make the pb routines in sander more reliable...thx
>
> ...dac
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> The AMBER Mail Reflector
> To post, send mail to amber_at_scripps.edu
> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo_at_scripps.edu
>

• application/x-gzip attachment: amber_bug.tar.gz

• Next message: Geoff Wood: "Re: AMBER: hybrid remd"
• Previous message: David Mobley: "Re: AMBER: bug in reprocessing with PB?"
• In reply to: David A. Case: "Re: AMBER: bug in reprocessing with PB?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]