AMBER Archive (2007)Subject: AMBER: hybrid remd
From: Geoff Wood (geoffrey.wood_at_epfl.ch) 
Date: Wed May 09 2007 - 06:22:09 CDT
 
 
 
 
>
 
Slightly from first email but essentially the same:
 
> To whom it may concern,
 
>
 
> I am attempting to run hybrid remd simulations with amber 9 but I  
 
> find that I cannot get them started.  I am probably making a simple  
 
> mistake in the specification of the file names, any help would be  
 
> much appreciated.
 
>
 
> The error I am getting is the following:
 
>
 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 
> ----------
 
>    3.  ATOMIC COORDINATES AND VELOCITIES
 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 
> ----------
 
>
 
>
 
>   FATAL: NATOM mismatch in coord and topology files
 
>
 
>
 
> This error appears in the stripped output file (i.e. a file called  
 
> something like mdout.rep01.strip)
 
> In the full output file it looks as if the calculation has finished  
 
> (the file is called mdout.rep01) i.e.
 
>
 
>  Exiting runmd after getting initial energies for REMD           0
 
> wrapping first mol.:  1.009557807795775E-014   68.4142020000000
 
>    96.4591000000000
 
>
 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 
> ----------
 
>    5.  TIMINGS
 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 
> ----------
 
>
 
> |>>>>>>>>PROFILE of Average TIMES>>>>>>>>>
 
>
 
>
 
>
 
>
 
>
 
> The groupfile looks like
 
>
 
> -O -i mdin.rep01 -o mdout.rep01 -p prm -c inpcrd.rep01 -r  
 
> restrt.rep01 -x mdcrd.rep01 -inf mdinfo.rep01
 
> .
 
> .
 
> .
 
> .
 
>
 
> The input files look like:
 
>
 
> Full box (mdin.rep01)
 
>
 
> comment
 
>  &cntrl
 
>   imin = 0, irest = 1, ntx = 2,
 
>   ntb = 2, pres0 = 1.0, ntp = 1,
 
>   taup = 2.0,
 
>   cut = 10, ntr = 0,
 
>   ntc = 2, ntf = 2,
 
>   tempi = 0.0, temp0 = 300.0,
 
>   ntt = 3, gamma_ln = 1.0,
 
>   repcrd=0, numexchg=40, numwatkeep=350,
 
>   nstlim = 1000, dt = 0.002,
 
>   ntpr = 100, ntwx = 100, ntwr = 1000
 
> &end
 
> &ewald
 
> &end
 
>
 
> Reduced number of waters (mdin.rep01.strip)
 
>
 
> comment
 
>  &cntrl
 
>   imin = 0, irest = 1, ntx = 2,
 
>   ntb = 0,
 
>   igb=1,
 
>   cut = 999, ntr = 0,
 
>   ntc = 2, ntf = 2,
 
>   tempi = 0.0, temp0 = 366.0,
 
>   ntt = 3, gamma_ln = 1.0,
 
>   repcrd=0, numexchg=40, numwatkeep=350,
 
>   nstlim = 1000, dt = 0.002,
 
>   ntpr = 100, ntwx = 100, ntwr = 1000
 
> /
 
>
 
>
 
> I have placed both the full parm file (prm) and reduced parm file  
 
> (prm.strip) in the same directory. For the stripped parm I have  
 
> tried with and without the counter ions that are present in the  
 
> full calculation.  I think it is preferable to omit them in a GB  
 
> energy evaluation.  The stripped parm was made using leap and a pdb  
 
> that ptraj generated  from a short md run involving the full system.
 
>
 
> The input coordinates are for the full system ( from a short md run  
 
> for equilibration) and are placed in the same directory as  
 
> inpcrd.rep01 etc.
 
>
 
> Thanks in advance,
 
>
 
> Dr Geoffrey Wood
 
> Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
 
> SB - ISIC - LCBC
 
> BCH 4108
 
> CH - 1015 Lausanne
 
>
 
>
 
>
 
>
 
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------
 
The AMBER Mail Reflector
 
To post, send mail to amber_at_scripps.edu
 
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo_at_scripps.edu
 
 
  
 |