AMBER Archive (2007)Subject: Re: AMBER: restraint value: written but none specified
From: Ben Sattelle (ben.sattelle_at_postgrad.manchester.ac.uk)
Date: Fri Apr 20 2007 - 16:51:30 CDT
prior to this was minimisation,
&cntrl
imin=1, maxcyc=1000, ncyc=1000, cut=9.0,
icfe=1,
clambda=0.0000,
klambda=1,
/
in which RESTRAINT=0.0 for previous runs and RESTRAINT=non-zero for the one in
question, again, this input has been used for previous runs where
RESTRAINT=0.0
was printed.
diff'ing mini.inp (above) and *.mdin (posted previously) for both cases yeilds
no difference. Is is possible the non-zero restraint arrises from the prmtop
and inpcrd files?
the only difference in setup was the use of solvatecap to place 1 water
molecule
in 'gap' created by amino acid mutation of M->A and M->G. appart from the
mutations (implemented in the pdb file) and the additional water molecule the
inputs are identical. thanks for your prompt reply, Ben.
> Ben Sattelle wrote:
>> Dear list,
>>
>> output includes a restraint value although none were specified (ntr=0),
>>
>>
>> `EAMBER (non-restraint)` and `RESTRAINT` values have not been
>> written to output
>> for previous runs using this input, any feedback on possible reasons
>> for this
>> gratefully recieved. Best wishes, Ben.
>>
>>
> Did you check that the input values echoed in your output file are
> identical to those in prior output files? You might clip out the
> opening section of a "good" and "bad" output file, where the input
> options are listed, and run diff on these excerpts.
>
> I suspect you may find a change in the opening of the output files
> that will explain the trouble - and the inputs will not be what what
> you thought they were, after all.
>
> C
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber_at_scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo_at_scripps.edu
|