AMBER Archive (2007)

Subject: Re: AMBER: psi , phi angles

From: Carlos Simmerling (carlos.simmerling_at_gmail.com)
Date: Mon Mar 05 2007 - 11:39:40 CST


why not? we have used it. does it give an error, or wrong structure?
the original poster could also use restraints, it's not clear what the goal
is.

On 3/5/07, Piotr Cieplak <cieplak_at_cgl.ucsf.edu> wrote:
>
>
> No, "impose" does not work correctly.
> P.
>
>
> On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Carlos Simmerling wrote:
>
> > Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 07:08:27 -0500
> > From: Carlos Simmerling <carlos.simmerling_at_gmail.com>
> > Reply-To: amber_at_scripps.edu
> > To: amber_at_scripps.edu
> > Subject: Re: AMBER: psi , phi angles
> >
> > check the manual, you can use the "impose" command
> >
> > On 3/5/07, deepti nayar <deepti.icgeb_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> hi
> >>
> >> I have build a phe-phe dipeptide using xleap. my next task is to
> >> change the torsion angles (psi and phi) at a certain interval and then
> >> note the corresponding energy. can anybody tell me if there is any way
> >> out to do it using leap (amber9).
> >> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> The AMBER Mail Reflector
> >> To post, send mail to amber_at_scripps.edu
> >> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo_at_scripps.edu
> >>
> >
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> The AMBER Mail Reflector
> To post, send mail to amber_at_scripps.edu
> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo_at_scripps.edu
>

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber_at_scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo_at_scripps.edu