AMBER Archive (2007)

Subject: RE: AMBER: Disulfide Bonds

From: Beale, John (jbeale_at_stlcop.edu)
Date: Wed Feb 28 2007 - 07:37:48 CST


Jerome,

Yes, I did rename the CyS into CYX.

John

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-amber_at_scripps.edu [mailto:owner-amber_at_scripps.edu] On Behalf Of Jerome.GOLEBIOWSKI_at_unice.fr
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 7:27 AM
To: amber_at_scripps.edu
Subject: Re: AMBER: Disulfide Bonds

Did you rename your cysteine residues (CYS) into CYX in your pdb ?
Jerome

Selon "Beale, John" <jbeale_at_stlcop.edu>:

> I have a problem that I hope is fairly simple. I am working with a small
> peptide that has a single disulfide bond. I do the correct "bond"
> procedure in LEaP, and when I view the structure with "Edit" in LEaP
> the disulfide bond is intact. When I do a minimization on the structure
> and examine the pdb file generated with ambpdb from the *.rst file, I
> find that the disulfide bond is no longer intact and the two sulfur
> atoms have moved away from each other.
>
>
>
> Can someone tell me what I can do to be certain that the disulfide bond
> remains intact after LEaP?
>
>
>
> John
>
>
>
>

-- 
Jérôme Golebiowski, Ph D.
Lab CMBA, University of Nice Sophia Antipolis
06108 nice cedex 2
France
tel: +33 (0)4 92 07 61 03
http://www.unice.fr/lcmba
http://www.unice.fr/lcmba/golebiowski
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber_at_scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo_at_scripps.edu
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber_at_scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo_at_scripps.edu