| AMBER Archive (2007)Subject: AMBER: Help:    1 ns for implicit solvent (GB) calculations, enough?
From: Catein Catherine (askamber23_at_hotmail.com)Date: Tue Feb 13 2007 - 22:18:23 CST
 
 
 
 
Dear Sir/Madam,
 I read from the literature that implicit solvent models convergent faster, 
just it may reach equilbrium faster than explicit solvent.  Thus, I am
 writing to ask what is the typical stimulation time for a system with 700
 residues using implicit solvent (GB) in Amber?
 
 I noted that the potential energy remain more or less constant after 200 ps, 
then, I run the production period for a further 1 ns.  Is it an acceptable
 time for implicit solvent (GB) calculations? if not, how long should be used
 for publication purposes?
 
 Best regards,
 Catherine.
 _________________________________________________________________
Learn English via Shopping Game, FREE!
 http://www.linguaphonenet.com/BannerTrack.asp?EMSCode=MSN06-03ETFJ-0211E
 
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
 To post, send mail to amber_at_scripps.edu
 To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo_at_scripps.edu
 
 
 
 |