|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMBER Archive (2004)Subject: AMBER: About MM/PBSA, PB Calculation
From: nlxc (nlxc2000_at_yahoo.com)
Hi,
1) I found almost all of those compounds with large error are compounds with amine group (NH2 in the terminal.) or group O-C=O or group H-C=O Almost all the compounds with the above groups are not calculated very well.
2) I checked the plots of RMSD vs. time and PBCAL vs. time, most of those "bad" compounds are not very stable, but not particularly unstable comparing with the rest of "good" compounds. Lot of them flucatuate a lot ( from 0.2 - 1.0 A RMSD). But there are also several "bad" compounds with very stable RMSD and energy (PBCAL) plots.
Since I have run about 1ns MD for those compounds with large error, I don't think simple longer simulation with the current protocol can make them more stable. I have also checked all the bond orders. Since they all are neutral compounds, the charges added from prep file are almost 0 (~0.004).
Please let me know if you have any suggestions about why those particular subgroups affect my PB calculation and how I can improve my results. How to improve my MD protocol to make the those small ligand simulations more stable?
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|