AMBER Archive (2004)Subject: AMBER: RESP charges in Fe+3 heme system
From: Sebastian Fernandez Alberti (seba_at_unq.edu.ar)
Date: Thu Aug 26 2004  12:43:08 CDT
Dear all,
I am calculating partial charges for a hemeFe+3 system. The Fe atom is
bounded to the 4 pirrolic N, a SH2 as ligand and the proximal histidine.
The total charge or the system is +1. Using a BLYP/631G* basis, I have
obtained a MK partial charge for the Fe atom= 1.36. But RESP partial
charges at the same lavel of approximation, give me a Fe partial charge=
1.9. That is unreasonable for a Fe+3 atomic center. I am using the RED
program and a Fe atomic radius of 1.8. I would like to use RESP partial
charge in order to define atomic similarities and groups of atoms with
a net total partial charges. Can anybody suggest me what could be wrong
in the RESP calculation?
Thanks in adavance,
Sebastian Fernandez Alberti

The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber_at_scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo_at_scripps.edu
