|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMBER Archive (2004)Subject: AMBER: charge problem in minimization
From: yen li (chem_me2000_at_yahoo.com)
Hi amber friends,
I have a problem in the minimization of a charged argenine dipeptide molecule (overall charge is +2 units). I am using AMBER7 and the distance dependent dielectric for the simulation. The input file is given as below
&cntrl
imin=1,
ntx=1,ntb=0,
ntr=0,dielc=4,cut=300,
maxcyc=1000, ncyc=500,
&end
&ewald
use_pme=0,
eedmeth=5,
&end
The problem is that in the output file where it shows the ‘sum of charges from parm topology file’ is giving +1 unit (output file is attached). When I have tried the same for one more system containing only the C-terminal alanine peptide, the charge on the molecule is -1.0 unit, but in the output file the charge is -0.5 unit. When the same is done for the alanine dipeptide, where the overall charge is zero, the output file also reports the charge to be zero.
I want to know that what is the possible reason of the charge getting reduced to exactly half in the cases when there is a overall charge on the molecules, and is it affecting the electrostatics calculations and has it anything to do with the ewald option which is off in the present case.
Thanks.
The AMBER Mail Reflector To post, send mail to amber_at_scripps.edu To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo_at_scripps.edu
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|