AMBER Archive (2004)

Subject: Re: AMBER: Bad contacts

From: Carlos Simmerling (carlos_at_csb.sunysb.edu)
Date: Wed Jun 09 2004 - 13:56:09 CDT

this doesn't make sense- you minimized the structure for 1000 steps
and the energy did not change?
carlos

>This structure is
> subjected to energy minimization for 1000 steps in Sander (Amber7), but
> no change is made in either energy level or structure geometry. These two
> residues still make 'aa clashing' in SwizzPDB Viewer.
>
>

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber_at_scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo_at_scripps.edu