AMBER Archive (2004)

Subject: AMBER: time-averaged restraints

From: John (john.dalmaris_at_imperial.ac.uk)
Date: Fri May 14 2004 - 12:04:49 CDT


Hello,

I have been attempting to run an NMR refinement simulated annealing. I tried
the standard way with no time-averaged restraints (instantaneous) which
worked fine. When tried the time-averaged (input file can be found in
http://dumb.ch.ic.ac.uk/~john/share/SA/) I get this at the beginning of the
simulation:

 NSTEP = 9 TIME(PS) = 0.009 TEMP(K) = 0.00 PRESS = 0.0
 Etot = -32901.4768 EKtot = 0.0208 EPtot = -32901.4976
 BOND = 44.0211 ANGLE = 56.0840 DIHED = 140.0414
 1-4 NB = -34.9194 1-4 EEL = -31247.8230 VDWAALS = -4904.0965
 EELEC = 3033.9212 EHBOND = 0.0000 RESTRAINT = 11.2737
 EAMBER (non-restraint) = -32912.7713
 Ewald error estimate: 0.8953E-03
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

--

============================================================================ === NMR restraints for step 9 Energy (this step): Bond = 11.262 Angle = 0.000 Torsion = 0.011 Energy (tot. run) : Bond = 10.086 Angle = 0.000 Torsion = 0.010

DEVIATIONS: Target=(r2+r3)/2 Target = closer of r2/r3 This step Entire run This step Entire run ave. rms ave. rms ave. rms ave. rms Bond 1.767 1.823 1.767 1.823 0.800 0.800 0.800 0.800 Angle 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Torsion 165.000 165.000 165.000 165.000 106.429 106.486 106.429 106.486 ============================================================================ ===

NSTEP = 10 TIME(PS) = 0.010 TEMP(K) = 325.61 PRESS = 0.0 Etot = -28039.9418 EKtot = 4840.2583 EPtot = -32880.2001 BOND = 43.9056 ANGLE = 56.1462 DIHED = 140.0501 1-4 NB = -34.9133 1-4 EEL = -31247.8857 VDWAALS = -4904.0883 EELEC = 3034.0176 EHBOND = 0.0000 RESTRAINT = 32.5677 EAMBER (non-restraint) = -32912.7677 Ewald error estimate: 0.8945E-03 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --

============================================================================ === NMR restraints for step 10 Energy (this step): Bond = 32.568 Angle = 0.000 Torsion = 0.000 Energy (tot. run) : Bond = 12.334 Angle = 0.000 Torsion = 0.009

DEVIATIONS: Target=(r2+r3)/2 Target = closer of r2/r3 This step Entire run This step Entire run ave. rms ave. rms ave. rms ave. rms Bond 2.767 2.803 1.867 1.921 1.800 1.800 0.900 0.900 Angle 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Torsion 325.668 325.777 181.067 181.078 267.097 267.322 122.495 122.570 ============================================================================ ===

The Temperature rises rapidly.

I have also tried the same system in vacuum and again while it works fine without implementing the time-averaged restraints, upon implementing them the rapid increase of the temperature occurs at the same time step and getting this error message:

Frac coord min, max: -2.10318734371480D-003 0.500000000000000 The system has extended beyond the extent of the virtual box. Restarting sander will recalculate a new virtual box with 30 Angstroms extra on each side, if there is a restart file for this configuration. EWALD BOMB in subroutine Routine: map_coords (ew_force.f) Atom out of bounds. If a restart has been written, restarting should resolve the error

I have tried various TAUTP and decay parameters but still getting the same problem. Has anyone used time-averaged restraints that can provide a helping hand?

Thanks for the help.

Bets wishes,

John

----------------------------------------------------------------------- The AMBER Mail Reflector To post, send mail to amber_at_scripps.edu To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo_at_scripps.edu