AMBER Archive (2004)

Subject: Re: AMBER: LES question

From: Lishan Yao (yaolisha_at_mail.msu.edu)
Date: Wed Feb 11 2004 - 13:52:09 CST

It still can't be done correctly. This is the error message.
p0_3901: (26.572858) net_send: could not write to fd=5, errno = 14
p0_3901: p4_error: net_send write: -1
    p4_error: latest msg from perror: Bad address
Killed by signal 2.
/opt/programs/mpich-1.2.5/bin/mpirun: line 1: 3901 Broken
pipe
/opt/programs/amber7-RH9-MPICH-FOR-LISHAN-2/exe/sander.LES "-O" "-i"
"md_nvt1.in" "-o" "md_nvt1.out" "-p" "ycd_1p60_les.prmtop" "-c"
"ycd_1p60_les.inpcrd" "-r" "md_nvt1.restrt" "-x" "md_nvt1.crd" "-e"
"md_nvt1.ene" -p4pg /home/yaolisha/YCD/1P60/MD_NEW/LES/PI3792 -p4wd
/home/yaolisha/YCD/1P60/MD_NEW/LES

Lishan

On Wed, 2004-02-11 at 12:55, Carlos Simmerling wrote:
> Lishan,
>
> I used standard amber7 compiled under Linux with g77
> using your inputs (your crd, prmtop, etc) and it works
> properly. Our output files match up until I get "Single
> temperature bath for LES and non-LES" where you get
> "LES particles coupled to a separate bath". My output
> is the correct behavior, yours is not.
>
> I don't understand this. Did you run the sander tests after you
> compiled the program?
>
> Carlos
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Lishan Yao" <yaolisha_at_mail.msu.edu>
> To: <amber_at_scripps.edu>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 4:02 PM
> Subject: Re: AMBER: LES question
>
>
> > Hi:
> > Here are input files for two programs.
> >
> > Input file for addles.
> >
> > file rprm name=(ycd_1p60_new.prmtop) read
> > file rcvb name=(md_npt1.restrt) read
> > file wprm name=(ycd_1p60_les.prmtop) wovr
> > file wcrd name=(ycd_1p60_les.inpcrd) wovr
> > action
> > omas
> > spac numc=4 pick #mono 107 115 done
> > spac numc=4 pick #mono 146 156 done
> > spac numc=4 pick #mono 268 276 done
> > spac numc=4 pick #mono 307 317 done
> > *EOD
> >
> >
> > Input file for sander.LES
> >
> > molecular dynamics run
> > &cntrl
> > imin=0,irest=1,ntx=5,tempi=100.0,
> > ntt=1,temp0=300.0,tautp=0.5,
> > ntp=0,
> > ntb=1,ntc=2,ntf=2,
> > nstlim=250000,dt=0.002,
> > ntwe=1000,ntwx=1000,ntpr=100,
> > &end
> >
> >
> > Lishan
> >
> >
> >
> > Tue, 2004-02-10 at 16:01, Vlad Cojocaru wrote:
> > > Well, to me it seems that you are coupling the LES region to another
> > > bath. My LES protocols run properly now but I am using the same
> > > temperature for both LES non-LES. I guess it would be useful if you give
> > > an input file both from your addles and from your dynamics so people can
> > > judge what's up
> > > vlad
> > >
> > > Lishan Yao wrote:
> > >
> > > >Hi:
> > > > I posted this problem about two weeks ago. And I really appreciate
> > > >all the responses, which helped me solve several problems. But
> > > >sander.LES still can't be run correctly.
> > > > Here is the output I got from sander.LES. 1). The number of water
> > > >molecule is wrong. It should be about 15000. 2). The total charge is a
> > > >little bit larger than what it should be. I think something is wrong
> > > >with topology file. But I exactly follow the manual. And there is no
> > > >complaint when I run addles.What could be wrong?
> > > >
> > > >Thanks in advance.
> > > >
> > > >Best,
> > > >Lishan
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Number of triangulated 3-point waters found: 7767
> > > >| Atom division among processors:
> > > >| 0 28277 56555
> > > >| Running AMBER/MPI version on 2 nodes
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Sum of charges from parm topology file = 0.00018743
> > > > Forcing neutrality...
> > > >
> > >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > > > 4. RESULTS
> > >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > > >
> > > ># degrees of freedom in non-LES region: 116597.
> > > ># degrees of freedom in LES region: 0.
> > > > LES particles coupled to separate bath
> > > > LES target temperature: 0.00
> > > > LES target kinetic energy: 0.00
> > > >non-LES target temperature: 300.00
> > > >non-LES target kinetic energy: 34754.19
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------
> > > > APPROXIMATING switch and d/dx switch using CUBIC SPLINE INTERPOLATION
> > > > using 5000.0 points per unit in tabled values
> > > > TESTING RELATIVE ERROR over r ranging from 0.0 to cutoff
> > > >| CHECK switch(x): max rel err = 0.3242E-14 at 2.436720
> > > >| CHECK d/dx switch(x): max rel err = 0.8156E-11 at 2.782960
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >The AMBER Mail Reflector
> > > >To post, send mail to amber_at_scripps.edu
> > > >To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo_at_scripps.edu
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > The AMBER Mail Reflector
> > To post, send mail to amber_at_scripps.edu
> > To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo_at_scripps.edu
> >
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> The AMBER Mail Reflector
> To post, send mail to amber_at_scripps.edu
> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo_at_scripps.edu
>

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber_at_scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo_at_scripps.edu