AMBER Archive (2003)

Subject: Re: AMBER: carnal iteration deviation from original crd file

From: Vlad Cojocaru (Vlad.Cojocaru_at_mpi-bpc.mpg.de)
Date: Fri Oct 24 2003 - 06:32:17 CDT

Are you sure that all your frames are included in the crd traj file?
When you visualize them can you see all of them.....this number is a bit
big so maybe if you do a selection (SELECT MOD 5..lets say) for the
output with Carnal ..might help. Otherwise this shouldnt happen only if
some frames are damaged (at least to my knowledge).
Vlad

Dalmaris, John wrote:

>Dear Amber Users,
>
>After a simulation I got 11764 frames. But when I used carnal to calculate
>the RMSd using all my trajectory files (which should add up to 11764) the
>output file gives me an iteration number of 9798. Does anyone have any
>idea why this inconsistency?
>
>Thanks for the help.
>
>Best wishes,
>
>John
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>The AMBER Mail Reflector
>To post, send mail to amber_at_scripps.edu
>To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo_at_scripps.edu
>
>
> 

-- 
Vlad Cojocaru 
Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry 
Department: 060 
Am Fassberg 11, 37077 Goettingen, Germany 
tel: ++49-551-201.1327 
e-mail: Vlad.Cojocaru_at_mpi-bpc.mpg.de
home tel: ++49-551-9963204  

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber_at_scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo_at_scripps.edu