AMBER Archive (2003)Subject: Re: AMBER: charge of IRON in HEME!!
From: Qiang Lu (qiangl_at_uci.edu)
Date: Thu Sep 04 2003 - 19:40:48 CDT
Hi Pradipta,
You'd better not use +3 for iron. I used +2 for zinc before. The
result is not reasonable. You can try DFT B3lyp6-311+g* .
--
Best regards,
Qiang mailto:qiangl_at_uci.edu
=================Original message text===============
Hi,
I am wondering what is the best way to get charges of IRON in HEME. I
have IRON in +3 state. How people do it - just RESP using HF ESP (HF is
usually terrible for Fe containing molecules though)? Do people put some
constraints on the charge of Iron?
thanks.
Pradipta
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber_at_scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo_at_scripps.edu
==============End of original message text===========
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber_at_scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo_at_scripps.edu
|