AMBER Archive (2002)

Subject: Fw: Re:SURFTEN for GB

From: Lepsa (lepsik_at_marilyn.uochb.cas.cz)
Date: Fri Oct 25 2002 - 08:55:12 CDT

one more citation on the discussion on the "appropriateness" of the value

Chan et al, 1997, Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Str, 26, 425

Regards,

  Martin Lepsik

> Dear Giulio,
> yes, SURFTEN value of 0.0072 is correct (for the time being, maybe) for
GB.
> I've just found the original citation:
>
> Still et al: JACS 1990, vol 112, pg 6127
>
> All the best,
>
> Martin Lepsik
>
>
>
> > By the way, are the **GB** parameters of SURFTEN= 0.0072 and SURFOFF = 0
> > correct?
> > Thanks for your reply
> > Giulio
>
>