AMBER Archive (2002)

Subject: force field name

From: A. Hungie (hungie01_at_hotmail.com)
Date: Thu Aug 15 2002 - 08:50:48 CDT

Dear All,

I used force field "parm94.dat" for my MD simulations. As I have seen in
several papers, some authers cited to "Cornell et al. force field", while
some authers cited to "amber95 force field". I am a litle bit confuse that
why not "amber94 force field" because of parm94.dat. I would like to refer
force field name in my thesis. What name is correct? or can I use "amber95
force field of Cornell et al."?

Thank you very much in advance.

Regards,
Hungie

_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com