AMBER Archive (2001)

Subject: Re: sander VS sander_classic

From: Jarrod Smith (jsmith_at_reef.structbio.vanderbilt.edu)
Date: Thu Mar 08 2001 - 13:03:59 CST

Khatcharin Siriwong wrote:
> I obtained the SANDER result which quite different from SANDER_CLASSIC
> result and
> running SANDER toke cpu time more than running SANDER_CLASSIC.
>
> Could anyone help me to modify input for SANDER to obtain the
> corresponding result with SANDER_CLASSIC?

Here are a couple of resources which may help:

http://www.amber.ucsf.edu/amber/doc6/html/AMBER-sh-6.3.html#sh-6.3
http://structbio.vanderbilt.edu/hypermail/amber-archive/0396.phtml 

-- 
Jarrod A. Smith
Research Asst. Professor, Biochemistry
Asst. Director, Center for Structural Biology
Computation and Molecular Graphics
Vanderbilt University

jsmith_at_structbio.vanderbilt.edu