AMBER Archive (2009)

Subject: Re: [AMBER] Regarding rigid bond

From: aneesh cna (aneeshcna_at_gmail.com)
Date: Tue Dec 01 2009 - 23:17:46 CST

Thanks to all for your immediate reply. But, I think NTC = 3 wont work in
parellel run. What could be the solution for this?

On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 11:11 PM, Bill Ross <ross_at_cgl.ucsf.edu> wrote:

> > > the only option is to constrain all bonds.
> > The only way I know how to do this is by the belly option
>
> Oops, I forgot SHAKE..
>
> Bill
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER_at_ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER_at_ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber