AMBER Archive (2009)
Subject: [AMBER] Re: bug in antechamber
From: David Mobley (dlmobley_at_uno.edu)
Date: Mon Jul 13 2009 - 12:41:01 CDT
Junmei and all,
I just wanted to check in on this -- did you receive it? I didn't
receive any response.
On Jul 8, 2009, at 11:19 AM, David Mobley wrote:
> Dear Junmei and all,
> I believe I have found a bug in Antechamber/AmberTools (i.e. v. 1.27
> of Antechamber, and also the more recent AmberTools release).
> In particular, see the attached three mol2 files and try the
> following sequence of commands:
> antechamber -i 4-vinylpyridine_am1bcc_sybyl.mol2 -o out_sybyl.mol2 -
> fi mol2 -fo mol2 -c bcc -at sybyl
> antechamber -i 4-vinylpyridine_am1bcc_sybyl.mol2 -o out_sybyl_1.mol2
> -fi mol2 -fo mol2 -c bcc -at sybyl -j 1
> (These two output files are attached, as is the input file).
> In this case, the -j 1 option actually has no effect on atom/bond
> typing as far as I can tell, as the output atom/bond types are the
> same regardless of whether the j option is used.
> HOWEVER (and here is the problem!) the -j 1 option has a huge effect
> on the partial charge on the nitrogen atom.
> Please advise.
> David Mobley, Ph.D.
> Assistant Professor of Chemistry
> University of New Orleans
> New Orleans, LA 70148
> Office 504-280-6445
> Fax 504-280-6860
David Mobley, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor of Chemistry
University of New Orleans
New Orleans, LA 70148
AMBER mailing list